In the class I’m teaching this semester, Cities and the Environment, we’ve been debating the merits of urbanization from a sustainability perspective. One thing that is becoming clear is that density matters — it helps to determine the efficiency of resource use, the proximity of jobs and amenities, and the utility of public transportation. In general we’ve been zeroing in on the idea that more dense urban areas are likely to be more sustainable, or that density in general is a “good thing.”

With this in mind I read  a list of the 5 densest cities in the U.S., and according to Census data from 2010, they are:

1. New York
2. Los Angeles
3. San Francisco
4. Trenton-Ewing, N.J.
5. Honolulu

This list is unlikely to coincide with general notions of the 5 most sustainable cities in the U.S.; it doesn’t coincide with mine.

So obviously it’s not as easy as “greater density leads to greater sustainability”…but maybe density generates more opportunities for sustainability; maybe it’s a better starting point. Maybe it depends on what your notion of sustainability is.

More on this as class progresses!

Density in Delhi

Density in Delhi

This entry was posted in Buildings, Energy, Planning, Water. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Density

  1. Dan Fraikin says:

    That the list of dense cities from the census seems improbable (excludes Chicago, for instance) would prompt me to ask if the census defines cities the same way we intuitively do.
    Dan Fraikin

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s